R7 240/340
FOLDING@HOME PPD PERFORMANCE

GPU Folding Overview R7 240/340

Folding@Home PPD for the R7 240/340 represents the averages of folding work unit samples collected from a wide variety of users different computer hardware configurations.

Average values are used to best represent folding PPD performance of a R7 240/340 across different F@H projects and user variables such as power settings, overclocks, operating system and specific work units which can yield wildly different highs and lows for PPD scores on the same GPU platform.

Stats as ofSunday, 26 April 2026 03:05:42

Try the V8 web client for deeper live GPU and CPU insights.

Preview of the Folding@Home V8 web client showing active work units, current PPD comparisons, and live GPU and CPU statistics.

GPU PPD Average All OS

10,606

Average of 14 most recent PPD samples.

Work Unit Samples All OS

14

All-time sample volume for this GPU profile.

Overall Rank All GPUs

#421

Ranked 421 of 439 tracked GPUs.

Brand Rank AMD GPUs

#124

Ranked 124 of 133 AMD GPUs.

Folding STATISTICS Hawaii [R7 240/340] - AMD

DATA SAMPLES INFO
Filter applied, PPD samples all time
AVERAGE FOLDING PERFORMANCE
Based on ALL available PPD samples by filter
WORK UNIT PPD RECORDS
All Time
OS FILTER SAMPLES PPD
WU Per 24hrs
Time Per WU
Points Per WU
BEST PPD
WORST PPD
All OS AVG 14 10,606 0.47 50 hrs 47 mins 22,445 15,635 7,706
Windows 14 10,606 0.47 50 hrs 47 mins 22,445 15,635 7,706

Recent Work Unit Performance - R7 240/340

Average PPD is impacted by the types of research work units being done as they return different amounts of points and take different amounts of time.

The following shows the work unit allocation of research causes to better understand changes in PPD over time for the R7 240/340.

No work unit data recorded for the R7 240/340 in the past 12 weeks.

Data is provided in legacy mode until new work units are folded using our web client.

Recent Work Unit Performance Clusters - R7 240/340

The following visualization illustrates the PPD / Credit allocation of work units across different research causes, providing insight into how PPD varies by work unit PPD samples for the R7 240/340.

This analysis helps better understand the relationship between research causes and PPD/Credit, highlighting any performance trends as clusters or anomalies as outliers.

R7 240/340 kWh POWER CONSUMPTION & COST

Power consumption information for the R7 240/340 is based on an average wattage taken from vendor information for the lowest and highest power draws for the GPU under folding@home compute loads.

Wattage information is only for the GPU and does not include the host computers power usage.

GPU Power Draw
Watts - TDP
Daily Power Usage
kWh
Points per
kWh
Daily Cost at $0.10
per kWh
Power Cost
per 1m Points
50 W 1.20 kWh 8,838 $0.12 $11.314

R7 240/340 COMPUTE VS kWH USAGE DAY, MONTH, WEEK & YEAR

Folding@Home compute projections for the R7 240/340 can be used to help inform long term point goals and related costs based on 24/7 usage.

Duration Nick Name Points
Average
Work Units
Average
Power Usage
kWh
Power Cost
at $0.10 per kWh
Day PPD 10,606 0.47 1.20 kWh $0.12
Week PPW 74,242 3.31 8.40 kWh $0.84
Month PPM 322,599 14.37 36.50 kWh $3.65
Year PPY 3,871,190 172.47 438.00 kWh $43.80

5 BEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS - R7 240/340

The following data is the average PPD values for R7 240/340 project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home Web Client.

PPD
Rank
Project
ID
Cause
Research
PPD
Average
Points WU
Average
WUs Day
Average
WU Time
Average
1 18454 biofilm 10,606 22,445 0.47 50 hrs 47 mins

5 LOWEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS - R7 240/340

The following data is the average PPD values for R7 240/340 project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home Web Client.

PPD
Rank
Project
ID
Cause
Research
PPD
Average
Points WU
Average
WUs Day
Average
WU Time
Average
1 18454 biofilm 10,606 22,445 0.47 50 hrs 47 mins